Comments on: Make InvokeRequired/Invoke easy http://www.manitra.net/blog/dev/invokerequiredinvoke-easier/ Ideas on C# .NET Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:08:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: adrian http://www.manitra.net/blog/dev/invokerequiredinvoke-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-7592 adrian Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:08:37 +0000 http://www.manitra.net/blog/?p=31#comment-7592 Wow! This looks like a very nice and neat solution. Thank you for taking the tme to write this post. I have been looking at another approach where you decorate a function with with attribute as described here: http://weblogs.asp.net/rosherove/archive/2007/05.aspx?PageIndex=2 .. The solution works a treat but requires you to add 3 dlls to your projeect to achieve this! Wow! This looks like a very nice and neat solution. Thank you for taking the tme to write this post.

I have been looking at another approach where you decorate a function with with attribute as described here: http://weblogs.asp.net/rosherove/archive/2007/05.aspx?PageIndex=2

.. The solution works a treat but requires you to add 3 dlls to your projeect to achieve this!

]]> By: Fred http://www.manitra.net/blog/dev/invokerequiredinvoke-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-7016 Fred Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:10:25 +0000 http://www.manitra.net/blog/?p=31#comment-7016 Good method ;-) Thanks to share this idea Good method ;-)
Thanks to share this idea

]]> By: manitra http://www.manitra.net/blog/dev/invokerequiredinvoke-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-6090 manitra Mon, 25 May 2009 09:11:48 +0000 http://www.manitra.net/blog/?p=31#comment-6090 Hi German, The Display() can have any modifier on it, it does'nt matter. You could make it 'private' and remove the 'virtual' keyword if you don't want other classes to have access to it. Manitra. Hi German,

The Display() can have any modifier on it, it does’nt matter.

You could make it ‘private’ and remove the ‘virtual’ keyword if you don’t want other classes to have access to it.

Manitra.

]]> By: German http://www.manitra.net/blog/dev/invokerequiredinvoke-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-6089 German Mon, 25 May 2009 03:09:49 +0000 http://www.manitra.net/blog/?p=31#comment-6089 Sorry I meant to said "..the display method to be private" Sorry I meant to said “..the display method to be private”

]]> By: German http://www.manitra.net/blog/dev/invokerequiredinvoke-easier/comment-page-1/#comment-6088 German Mon, 25 May 2009 03:09:28 +0000 http://www.manitra.net/blog/?p=31#comment-6088 What if I want the Display method to be public? it cant because of being virtual.. What if I want the Display method to be public? it cant because of being virtual..

]]>